I'm sorry to my more serious readers, but I just could not resist when I saw this. The ad placement next to a story about our work on sexual versus asexual reproduction is priceless. The full story appears here on the UPI site. The paper is here on the Molecular Biology and Evolution site.
Field of Science
-
-
-
Antibiotics & Agriculture Part 4: The Transfer of Antibiotic Resistance21 hours ago in Memoirs of a Defective Brain
-
Keeping up to date21 hours ago in Games with Words
-
-
-
Supreme Court bungles the science in DNA patent decision3 days ago in Genomics, Evolution, and Pseudoscience
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Thanksgiving2 weeks ago in The Curious Wavefunction
-
-
Bioengineers go retro to build a calculator from living cells4 weeks ago in The Allotrope
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The Lure of the Obscure? Guest Post by Frank Stahl1 year ago in Sex, Genes & Evolution
-
-
Finding a new translation factor, and verifying it with help from my experimental friends1 year ago in Protein Evolution and Other Musings
-
Free ImageJ Macro -- for citing images1 year ago in Skeptic Wonder
-
-
-
The Large Picture Blog Has Moved1 year ago in The Large Picture Blog
-
Lab Rat Moving House1 year ago in Life of a Lab Rat
-
Goodbye FoS, thanks for all the laughs1 year ago in Disease Prone
-
Branson getting into microbial diversity in the deep sea2 years ago in The Greenhouse
Funny advert placement
I'm sorry to my more serious readers, but I just could not resist when I saw this. The ad placement next to a story about our work on sexual versus asexual reproduction is priceless. The full story appears here on the UPI site. The paper is here on the Molecular Biology and Evolution site.
3 comments:
Markup Key:
- <b>bold</b> = bold
- <i>italic</i> = italic
- <a href="http://www.fieldofscience.com/">FoS</a> = FoS
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hilarious!
ReplyDeleteThough as a side note, I'm always annoyed by articles that say scientists have discovered something completely new, when they are in fact verifying an idea that has been around for a long time.
HI Ben:
ReplyDeleteSince we are "stable-mates" at FoS, I assume that your comment was aimed at the Science News article (hopefully not the research article it cites). You probably are referring to the first sentence: "Iowa researchers say they've determined living organisms have good reason for engaging in sexual rather than asexual reproduction." It is true that we haven't "determined" this and we did not "say" that we did. Unfortunately these hyperbolic statements are common fare in some science journalism. Have a look at the original press release from which the article derives.
What I like about that first line is that you've determined it for "living organisms." It just doesn't work that well for the dead ones. :-)
ReplyDelete